Skip to main content

A very public split




Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper trade blows as leadership contest intensifies


Image result for Burnham cooper




Andy Burnham offers Jeremy Corbyn “a job”, in his Shadow Cabinet and presumably any government cabinet which Burnham may form at sometime in the future. A remarkably magnanimous gesture from a man who claims never to have voted against the party whip in the House of Commons, a man who has consistently advocated further austerity for the UK economy, has frequently demonstrated an ability for evasion, particularly during Ian Dale's LBC Radio programme and along with all but 48 members of the Parliamentary Labour Party, abstained on the vote on the Conservative Welfare Bill last July. Burnham qualifies this offer however, with an appeal for Labour party members who intend to vote for Corbyn in the leadership election, to move over to the Burnham camp to prevent Kendall or Cooper emerging as the winner.
This “offer” of course make two very sweeping assumptions. Namely that (a), Burnham will actually win the Leadership election and consequently be in a position to offer anyone a place in his Shadow Cabinet and (b) that he would actually win a General election at sometime in the future.
Perhaps the observer could be excused for thinking that the member for Leigh is optimistic, naïve, a little arrogant or even a mixture of all three. 



Image result for Burnham cooper


 

The “offer” to Jeremy Corbyn has widened and made very public, the split between Burnham and Cooper which has been festering away from public scrutiny for some weeks. The “Anyone but Corbyn” campaign has always had a fundamental problem, in that there are three candidates, all from the “right” of the party, proposing the same old status quo policies and all competing for the same voting support base. The only thing that unites the three is their fear and dislike for Corbyn.
With Cooper now publicly calling for Burnham to stand down from the leadership contest the divisions between her and Burnham and in the background Kendall, have shifted the debate away from the real issues and created a slanging match between three candidates, intent on promoting themselves as the only alternative. In standing away from this spectacle Jeremy Corby maintains his position of putting forward proposals and policies and refusing to become involved in the puerile activity of name calling and personal attacks.
This current hostility between Burnham, Cooper and Kendall, raises a pertinent question. If the only word they have to offer, the only appeal that they can present to Labour party members, the only message that they can offer to people around the country, is that only one of them is the person that can beat Jeremy Corbyn, then why should anyone trust in them to address or even understand, the real issues and problems which face this country today?






 
Homelessness, growing use of foodbanks, problems within the NHS, Welfare Cuts, austerity, education, banks, anti trade union legislation and a hundred other issues are the real priorities and it is only Jeremy Corbyn who is addressing these problems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe

The Parliamentary Labour Party conspirators are hatching another coup.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-labour-leadership-rebel-mps-a7202641.html Labour MPs plan for Corbyn victory  and plot how to confront an emboldened leader Even for the "Independent", the number and use of unnamed anonymous "sources" in this article is quite astonishing. However, amongst all the usual speculative delusion, there is one factor which causes concern to anyone who believes in the Labour Party, its principles and in he democratic process of the Labour movement. It is abundantly clear that elements within the Parliamentary Labour Party, are even now, planning another coup in the event that Jeremy Corbyn should emerge as winner in the current ballot. The failed coup of earlier this year, has now descended into a sham leadership election, because the conspirators still fail to accept the democratic decision of the Labour party membership and cling to

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t