Skip to main content

Déjà vu in Iraq and the changing map of the Middle East.



Britain to send Tornado jets to Iraq as Cameron considers arming Kurdish fighters


RAF aircrew
RAF Hercules delivering aid in northern Iraq





Thousand are still trapped on the mountain

There is a growing sense of déjà vu about the latest crisis in Iraq. The plight of those Yazidi civilians trapped on Mount Sinjar, certainly demands that the world take some humanitarian actions to supply food, water and shelter until such times as the remaining people there can be evacuated. The advances made by ISIL forces over the last few weeks have been truly remarkable and the allegations of atrocities carried out by the advancing army are clearly provoking demands for some form of military reaction from western governments. Without wishing to dismiss such reports out of hand however, we should bear in mind that allegations of atrocities have been around for as long as man has waged war. The German invasion of Belgium in 1914 produced very lurid stories concerning Nuns, babies and old people and again with similar stories in 1940. Military actions in Latvia, Viet Nam, Kenya, Malaya, Biafra and a thousand other conflicts, have generated many myths and stories which have later proved to be somewhat exaggerated. Of course at this time in history, it is not difficult for governments to generate “atrocity” propaganda, particularly when the perceived "enemy" is Muslim, as people in the west are already conditioned to believe (well almost), that anything Muslim is automatically a threat to our very existence and must defeated, preferably in a far away country rather than on the streets or in the fields of the United Kingdom. It is as if there is some form of agenda in the west seeking to create a revival of passions which will lead to a 21st century Crusade to "Free the Holy lands" from Islamic domination. The fact that the "Holy lands" are oil rich, is hardly acknowledged.
The point is that until very recently, “the west”, predominately in the form of the United States but aided and abetted by the United Kingdom and most of the EU, was actually arming, financing and training any forces in the Syrian civil war which were opposed to Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian government. The forces that now comprise ISIL, are a composite of a number of groups in Syria which have combined, as the so called Free Syrian Army fragmented into numerous splinter groups, all with different agenda's and ideals. (It is indeed fortunate, that those voices who combined to keep us out of the Syrian civil war were heeded.) The fact that all these FSA groups had western weapons and training, has been made infinitely more complicated and probably more dangerous because they are now equipped with weapons and technology captured from the Iraqi army, as the American equipped and trained force, installed after the overthrow of Saddam Husein, disintegrated and dispersed into the countryside. We are now even proposing to arm and supply the Kurds in Northern Iraq, who seem to have been the only military force opposing ISIL.This itself is a concept which was until now completely out of the question, as the Kurds have always been considered as a threat to Nouri al-Maliki and his Shia dominated government in Baghdad. How things quickly change in this complex world of Middle Eastern politics now that al-Maliki has fallen from favour and even his American sponsors areleading the clamour for him to resign and go.
We have now gone almost full circle in the pantomime of our involvement in Iraq. Two full scale invasions of the wretched country, one certainly illegal and one with very dubious provenance, have resulted in thousands of dead, a corrupt and splintered government and a Prime Minister (actually installed by the Americans and legitimised by an “election”) who will not resign and has deployed tanks and armour around his offices to retain his position. All the while, ISIL forces in the North and East of Iraq, continue to advance, capturing more and more territory and numerous towns and villages.
The headlines of today's papers are almost as one in reporting and even advocating involvement in air strikes on ISIL forces. We have been here before and the “mission creep” will, unless we are very careful, see a return to a massive involvement of western military forces in Iraq to attempt to repel a perceived invader. The irony of this whole tragedy is remarkable. The western powers are seeking to resist the inevitability of new borders and groupings in the area. I have raised the question before. Has anyone ever wondered why there are so many straight line borders in the Middle East? It was inevitable that those “countries”, artificially created after the First World war and given imposed governments friendly to the west, but not necessarily friendly to their own peoples, would sooner or later implode either by revolution or by invasion from outside forces. It is similar to pushing water uphill for “the west” to try to retain some semblance of status quo by military force, when all the evidence of history, the situation on the ground and the aspirations of the people are pointing in the opposite direction.






The Ghosts of Colonial Powers - What we want is not a united Arabia but a weak and disunited Arabia, split into little principalities …incapable of coordinated action against us.

In a few years from now, the map of the Middle east will be very different from what is essentially the Sykes Picot Agreement Map of 1916 with a few straight lines drawn in the sand around 1920 now. 

Iraq and it fate is the first of many changes to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe

The Parliamentary Labour Party conspirators are hatching another coup.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-labour-leadership-rebel-mps-a7202641.html Labour MPs plan for Corbyn victory  and plot how to confront an emboldened leader Even for the "Independent", the number and use of unnamed anonymous "sources" in this article is quite astonishing. However, amongst all the usual speculative delusion, there is one factor which causes concern to anyone who believes in the Labour Party, its principles and in he democratic process of the Labour movement. It is abundantly clear that elements within the Parliamentary Labour Party, are even now, planning another coup in the event that Jeremy Corbyn should emerge as winner in the current ballot. The failed coup of earlier this year, has now descended into a sham leadership election, because the conspirators still fail to accept the democratic decision of the Labour party membership and cling to

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t