Skip to main content

Maria Miller: Defiance and indignation on being ordered to say sorry.

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/maria-miller-expenses-culture-secretary-in-hot-water-as-shes-ordered-to-repay-5800-expenses-claim-9235638.html



Culture Secretary in hot water as she's ordered to repay £5,800 claim



Maria Miller: Commons statement.

  
This woman was originally ordered, by the "independent" Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, to pay back a total sum of £45,000.The Parliamentary Commissioner, can of course be over ruled by MP's should they consider the Commissioners findings or decisions to be in error or too harsh or as in this case, likely to be "difficult" for them  personally, the next time that they themselves are again caught with their own fingers in the till .
Consequently, ranks are closed as some members, under the guise of  the all party "Standards Committee" rush to the defence of Miller and reduce her "pay back punishment" from the recommended £45,000,to a mere £5,800. This figure is of course set against an original £90,000 wrongly claimed mortgage expenses which the Culture Secretary had submitted for property designated as her second home and where her parents lived.
There are those who may consider that even a sum of £45,000 is too small a "punishment" for expense claim abuse, albeit that the Standards Committee  cleared her of fiddling her expenses, commenting that "the judgement was finely balanced and considered she had acted reasonably in the light of the guidance available at the time”.
In response to a damning report which accused her of trying to thwart an investigation into her parliamentary expenses claims, Miller offered an apology to the House. It seems that every memo, request for information, question, or any other form of communication that Miller received from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, was immediately sent to her solicitors for consideration, response and inevitable delay.
Her apology for her delaying tactics can at best be described  as succinct, and dismissing in less than 40 seconds, the original allegations of expense irregularities, and then in acknowledging the role of the Standards Committee in her "acquittal" states that she "accepts the recommendations of the committee" and thanks them "for bringing this matter to an end".  
Her whole demeanor during this "statement" particularly toward  Labour MP John Mann who made the initial complaint about her claims, was one of defiance, and it seemed,  indignation that she should have even been put in the situation of having to explain her actions in the first place. 
It has been suggested that Miller only retains her role in cabinet because she is a woman and Cameron needs to at least be seen to be trying to maintain a gender balance around the table.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to suggest that Cameron prefers to surround himself and fill his cabinet, with arrogant people, people dismissive of any criticism, prepared to operate at the margins of proper behaviour and who show nothing but contempt for the people of this country, the tax payers, any form of regulatory body (especially when it comes to their own activities and expenses) and people without shame or principle.
Miller is only trying to fill that model.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Northern Ireland and Brexit. The return of "The Troubles"

Northern Ireland: police attacked in another night of disturbances | Northern Ireland | The Guardian When the "Brexit" debate was still filling our newspapers and our television screens, readers may remember why I had changed my mind since voting to leave at the referendum vote. Apart from the economic arguments, which had become crystal clear after peeling away all the lies and misrepresentations trotted out by Bozo Boris and his "Get Brexit Done" conspirators, there was always the problem of the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Would it be possible to have a border between the European Union and the United Kingdom where people, goods and services could pass freely between the two nations without customs restrictions, tariffs, duties and all the other formalities? Would it be possible to have one part of the United Kingdom treated differently from other parts of the United Kingdom, particularly when Scotland for example had voted overwhe

The Parliamentary Labour Party conspirators are hatching another coup.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-labour-leadership-rebel-mps-a7202641.html Labour MPs plan for Corbyn victory  and plot how to confront an emboldened leader Even for the "Independent", the number and use of unnamed anonymous "sources" in this article is quite astonishing. However, amongst all the usual speculative delusion, there is one factor which causes concern to anyone who believes in the Labour Party, its principles and in he democratic process of the Labour movement. It is abundantly clear that elements within the Parliamentary Labour Party, are even now, planning another coup in the event that Jeremy Corbyn should emerge as winner in the current ballot. The failed coup of earlier this year, has now descended into a sham leadership election, because the conspirators still fail to accept the democratic decision of the Labour party membership and cling to

New Agenda on Sunday is out Sunday, Apr. 28, 2019

https://paper.li/f-1346065353#/ Good morning everyone. Last weeks scare regarding Megan and Harry being sent to live "somewhere in Africa" seems to have been dispelled, at least for the time being. It now seems that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will take up residence in California.  Unless  they are actually  doing  some proper work in "The Golden State", I hope that they are taken off the civil list so that we do not have to fund their life choice. The nauseating Daily Mail is at it again. A headline this week, which I will not even bother to reproduce here, screams out in disgusting and repulsive bias without any acknowledgement to the factual basis of their "story". Spewing out their usual smears and embellished distortions about Hamas, the IRA, Hezbollah and the rest, the Mail condemns itself with ample justification, for the closure of a "newspaper," which again abuses 10 fold, the privilege of "freedom of t